(source from vaping360)
The best-known U.S. distributor of disposable vape Puff Bar has received a warning letter from the FDA, ordering the products to be removed from the market. The action came after months of news stories incorrectly claimed Puff Bar was exempt from FDA enforcement.
The letter was sent to Umais Abubaker, the owner of Cool Clouds Distribution, Inc., the largest and best known importer of the rectangular-shaped disposable e-cigarette. As we explained in a recent article, multiple Shenzhen, China factories produce Puff Bar products and offer them wholesale on Chinese e-commerce sites. Sending a warning letter to a single distributor may not cut off the flow of Puff Bars to American retail outlets.
The Puff Bar website believed to be run by Cool Clouds Distribution announced last week that it had “ceased all online sales & distribution in the U.S. until further notice,” so the FDA action is probably meaningless. The Puff Bar mogul will likely just move on to selling similar products with different branding.
FDA issued warning letters notifying 10 companies, including the maker of Puff Bar, to remove flavored disposable e-cigarettes and youth-appealing e-liquid products from the market for not having the required authorization. https://t.co/8M0ER6Qm0n pic.twitter.com/Ou8TCrIPgw— FDA Tobacco (@FDATobacco) July 20, 2020
Puff Bar launched last year, and became popular largely because JUUL had voluntarily removed its non-tobacco and menthol flavors from the market in November 2018. A year later, in January 2020, new FDA guidance prevented sales of all pod- and cartridge-based vaping products in flavors other than tobacco and menthol—except disposable products.
It was after the FDA guidance was issued in January that the news media became aware of Puff Bar, alerted by the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids and other tobacco control groups that claimed Puff Bars and other recently introduced disposable products were exempted from enforcement by the FDA.
That was never true. While the guidance did exempt disposable e-cigarettes, the exemption only applied to products that existed on the market before the Aug. 8, 2016 cutoff date set by the FDA Deeming Rule. No product can be introduced after that date without first submitting a Premarket Tobacco Application (PMTA) and receiving FDA marketing approval, which the sellers of Puff Bar certainly did not do.
However, beginning in late January—and ramping up after the FDA guidance took effect in early February—dozens of stories appeared in major news outlets that claimed otherwise. Most used Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids president Matthew Myers, or another member of his Bloomberg-funded tobacco control cabal, as their “expert” source.
Grateful that @FDATobacco has heard parents’ outraged voices about Puff Bar and others targeting teens! https://t.co/nrQ1eS18ZY— ParentsAgainstVaping (@ParentsvsVape) July 20, 2020
Some of the well-known reporters who wrote about the “Puff Bar loophole” included Sheila Kaplan of the New York Times, Matthew Perrone from Associated Press, Laurie McGinley of the Washington Post, and Allison Aubrey of NPR. (Perrone, in an article written today about the warning letter, repeats his earlier claim that “the flavor restrictions did not apply to disposable vaping products like Puff Bar.”)
All of these articles cited Myers’ contention that the FDA guidance gave a free pass to Puff Bar and similar products, and his claim that only a federal ban on all flavored vaping products would end the “epidemic” of teen vaping. None of the reporters in question bothered to ask the FDA if the “loophole” applied to products that were already on the market illegally.
As it turned out, the FDA warning letter to Puff Bar is based on the products being introduced without first receiving the required marketing approval through the PMTA process. There is simply no FDA guidance loophole that protects an already illegal product from being enforced against by the agency.
The FDA also issued several other warning letters today, including to other disposable vape manufacturers, and to companies selling e-liquid with supposedly child-appealing labels, such as My Little Pony-like images.